TU Wien:Enterprise & Process Engineering VU (Proper)
Daten[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
| Vortragende | Henderik Proper• Marianne Schnellmann• Charlotte Roos R. Verbruggen |
|---|---|
| ECTS | 6,0 |
| Letzte Abhaltung | 2025W |
| Sprache | English |
| Mattermost | enterprise-process-engineering • Register • Mattermost-Infos |
| Links | tiss:194152, eLearning |
| Masterstudium Business Informatics | Modul EE/FD - Enterprise Engineering Foundation (Pflichtfach) |
Inhalt[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Understand how different modelling approaches capture enterprise aspects (processes, data, actors, systems) and how they can be evaluated systematically.
Ablauf[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
WS 25/26:
- Structure: Course divided into two blocks: initial lecture phase (conceptual foundations of enterprise modelling and modelling frameworks) followed by student presentations on different modelling approaches
- Focus: Systematic analysis and comparison of modelling languages (e.g. MERODE, BPMN, ArchiMate, etc.) using a common analytical framework
- Group work: Ongoing group report structured along ~6 framework chapters, ~ 40 pages (e.g. purpose & context, abstraction & representation, model instances, modelling grammar, meta-models & linkage, tool support)
- Application: Each modelling approach had to be applied to a business case to illustrate its concepts and limitations
- Presentations: Short, non-graded presentations on selected modelling approaches
- Exams: Two written exams
WS24:
- The course is divided into two parts: BPMN (Part 1) and Enterprise Architecture (Part 2).
- After each session, a short TUWEL quiz (4 per Part) had to be completed before the next class.
- Each group prepared a PowerPoint summary for every session, submitted together with the group project.
- Groups could be randomly selected to present their summary (presentation not graded). Since the grading of the presentation was clarified only at the end of the semester, this gave the impression of an attendance requirement – recommendation: clarify this at the start of the semester.
- There was one group project per part (BPMN/EA), including modeling and documentation.
- A test was held at the end of each part.
Grading: Assignments 20 %, Group Work 40 %, Exams 40 %
- None of these components was repeatable.
- To pass the course, at least 50 % in BPMN and 50 % in EA were required. (No minimum required points for each tasks/tests)
Benötigte/Empfehlenswerte Vorkenntnisse[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
WS 25/26: not really needed, as everything is clarified in the lecture, though it definetly helps to have some experience with modelling languages to understand new ones faster
Vortrag[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
noch offen
Übungen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
WS 25/26: no individual assignments beside the group work that had to be prepared every week
Prüfung, Benotung[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
WS 25/26: two exams which together made up for 50% of the grade, 50 % for the groupwork (report),
10 % extra points for attending a sort of scientific survey (90 mins) on Zoom (announcement email for signing up for this easy survey (basically free points) was during the christmas break and thus could be missed, if you didn't check your mails like me....)
Dauer der Zeugnisausstellung[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
WS 25/26: for mid-term and final exam > 4 weeks
Zeitaufwand[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
WS 25/26: studying for the two exams didn't require that much effort, though the instructors didn't really specify what was going to be part of the exam upfront,
Unterlagen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
noch offen
Tipps[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Do the group work with enough time, since coordinating with all people involved can be tricky sometimes especially while taking exams at the same time.
Highlights / Lob[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Interesting perspective on enterprise architecture, though nothing ground breaking if you've had a process modelling lecture in the bachelor's.
Verbesserungsvorschläge / Kritik[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
WS 25/26: Instead of 7/8 different modelling languages that we will go through in the weekly presentations, choose the 2/3 most relevant ones used in the industry/academia and go more into detail with them. This ensures the students actually remember the different approaches apart from their own ones.