TU Wien:Diskrete Mathematik für Informatik UE (Gittenberger)/Übungen WS13/Beispiel 2
2) Use a suitable graph theoretical model to solve the following problems:
- (a) Show that in every city at least two of its inhabitants have the same number of neighbours!
- (b) 7 friends want to send postcards according to the following rules:
- (i) Each person sends and receives exactly 3 cards.
- (ii) Each one receives only cards from those to whom he or she sent a card and vice versa. Tell how this can be done or prove that this is impossible!
Theory[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Solution[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
2.a[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Lets assume that there are no people with the same number of neugbours, therefore we want to proof the existence of where no pair element of exists with
Note: I replace to make formulas easier readable.
As all Degrees should be different by our initial definition the minimum degree for n vertizes is:
Gaussian Sum formula
From the handshake Lemma we know that the sum of all degrees is .
Therefore is our minimal number of edges we need to construct the graph.
Now we want to know the maximum number of edges possible in a simple graph. So we pick all pairs vi, vj from V. This can be calculated as follows:
All possibilities to take 2 elements from n vertizes:
Now the minimal number of edges we need to constuct G must be smaller or equal to the maximum of possible edlges in a graph
You can now solve this relation and see that it is impossible for n>0, therefore it is impossible that our assumed graph G can exist.
Note: I think it can also be proved by induction, but this is fairly simple as well. :)
2.a alternate[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Same assumptions as above. Simple graph (everyone has a neighbour, noone is its own neighbour, no multiple edges). Lets assume there is a graph with
The number of Edges using the Hand Shaking Lemma:
Here we have our contradiction. In a simple graph the maximal degree of a node is . This implies that at least two nodes have to have the same number of neighbours. --NeroBurner (Diskussion) 09:35, 16. Okt. 2013 (CEST)
2.b[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
As the letters always go in both directions (by definition ii), we can replace this directed edges with one undirected edge. Then we have an undirected cubic graph with 7 vertices and d(v) = 3 for all v element of V. Now this is exactly what we disproved in Sample 1b.
2.b addition[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
disproved in 1.b. Only possible when we allow loops
--NeroBurner (Diskussion) 09:26, 16. Okt. 2013 (CEST)