TU Wien:International Trade Theory and Policy VO (Stehrer)/Exercises
Topic 1: Imports, Tariffs, and Quotas[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Exercise 1: Autarky vs. Free Trade Equilibrium[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Focus: Calculating autarky equilibrium, import levels, and welfare gains.
Problem: Consider a domestic market for widgets with the following demand and supply schedules:
- Demand:
- Supply:
Questions:
- Calculate Autarky: Find the autarky equilibrium price () and quantity () where domestic demand equals domestic supply.
- Free Trade: The country opens up to trade. The world market price is . Assume the country is "small" and cannot influence world prices. Calculate the new domestic quantity demanded () and domestic quantity supplied ().
- Imports: Calculate the volume of imports ().
- Welfare: Using the formula (where ), calculate the total welfare gain from trade.
Solution Exercise 1[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Autarky: . Substituting back: .
- Free Trade: At : . .
- Imports: .
- Welfare: . .
Exercise 2: The Welfare Effects of an Import Tariff[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Focus: Calculating the impact of tariffs on price, imports, government revenue, and deadweight loss.
Problem: Continuing from a similar market structure, assume a country has the following curves:
- Demand:
- Supply:
- World Price:
Questions:
- Free Trade Baseline: At the free trade price of , calculate the initial imports ().
- Tariff Imposition: The government introduces a tariff per unit. This raises the domestic price to . Calculate the new domestic quantity demanded, new domestic quantity supplied, and the new level of imports ().
- Tariff Income: Calculate the revenue collected by the government ().
- Welfare Loss: Calculate the net welfare loss caused by the tariff. Formula: .
Solution Exercise 2[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Baseline: At : . Imports .
- Tariff: New Price .
- .
- .
- .
- Income: .
- Loss: . (Net welfare loss of 100).
Exercise 3: Conceptual - Elasticity and Producer Rent[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Topic: Understanding how supply elasticity affects producer rent losses.
Problem: Compare two different industries in a country that is about to open up to trade (where World Price < Autarky Price).
- Industry A has a completely inelastic supply curve (vertical).
- Industry B has a completely elastic supply curve (horizontal).
Questions:
- In Industry A, when the price drops to the world price, what happens to the domestic quantity supplied? Does the producer rent decrease significantly or minimally?
- In Industry B, when the price drops to the world price, what happens to the domestic quantity supplied? What is the loss in producer rent?
Solution Exercise 3[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Industry A (Inelastic): Quantity supplied remains constant. Producer rent suffers a large loss because they sell the same amount at a lower price.
- Industry B (Elastic): Domestic firms exit the market (quantity supplied drops to zero). There is no loss in producer rent because producer rent was already zero in autarky (Revenue = Variable Costs).
Topic 2: Exports and Subsidies[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Exercise 1: Welfare Distribution in Exports[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Topic: Winners and Losers under Free Trade (Small Country)
Problem: Consider a domestic market for Wheat with the following functions:
- Demand:
- Supply:
Questions:
- Autarky: Calculate the autarky price () and quantity ().
- Free Trade: The world market price is . Determine the new domestic Quantity Demanded, Quantity Supplied, and Exports ().
- Welfare Distribution:
- Calculate the change in Consumer Rent ().
- Calculate the change in Producer Rent ().
- Show that the Net Welfare Gain () equals the area of the "gains from trade" triangle.
Solution Exercise 1[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Autarky: .
- Free Trade ():
- . Exports .
- Welfare:
- (Loss).
- (Gain).
- .
Exercise 2: Export Subsidy (Constant World Price)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Topic: Subsidy costs and efficiency loss (Deadweight Loss)
Problem: Use the same market (, ). Initial Free Trade with . Government introduces an Export Subsidy of .
Questions:
- Price & Quantity: Calculate new producer price, consumer price, and export level ().
- Budget Impact: Calculate total subsidy cost ().
- Welfare Analysis: Calculate the Net Welfare Loss using .
Solution Exercise 2[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- New State: Price = 35. . Exports .
- Cost: .
- Net Welfare Loss: . Loss = .
Exercise 3: Export Subsidy with Terms of Trade Effect[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Topic: Large Country case (Declining World Price)
Problem:
- Initial World Price:
- Export Subsidy:
- World Price Reaction: Falls to .
Questions:
- Domestic Price: What is the new price domestic producers receive?
- Welfare Components: Why is the welfare loss larger in this scenario compared to the small country case?
Solution Exercise 3[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Domestic Price: .
- Net Effect: Larger loss because of the Terms of Trade loss. The subsidy lowers the world price, effectively subsidizing foreign consumers.
Topic 3: Strategic Trade Policy[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Exercise 1: Reaction Curves & Unilateral Subsidy[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Topic: Graphical derivation and "Profit Shifting".
Problem: Boeing (A) and Airbus (B) compete in quantities.
- Demand:
- Marginal Costs:
Questions:
- Initial Equilibrium: Derive the reaction function for Airbus () and calculate the Cournot-Nash equilibrium.
- Unilateral Subsidy: Country A gives a subsidy . How does shift? Explain the mechanism.
- Profit Analysis: Explain "Profit Shifting" in this context.
Solution Exercise 1[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Reaction: . Intersection at .
- Subsidy: New MC = 5. shifts outward. Boeing produces more; Airbus responds by producing less.
- Profit: Boeing gains market share and profit; Airbus loses profit.
Exercise 2: The Prisoner's Dilemma (Bilateral Subsidies)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Topic: Strategic interaction and Welfare Analysis.
Problem: Country B retaliates with its own subsidy .
Questions:
- Graph: Show the shift of . Where is the new equilibrium?
- Welfare Matrix: Explain why countries subsidize even if the (Sub, Sub) payoff is worse than (Free, Free).
- Third Country Effect: What happens to the consumers in the third market?
Solution Exercise 2[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Graph: Both curves shift out. Higher total quantity, lower price.
- Dilemma: Subsidizing is a dominant strategy (Nash Equilibrium), leading to a Prisoner's Dilemma outcome.
- Third Country: Consumers win due to significantly lower prices.
Exercise 3: Optimal Subsidy & Total Welfare[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Calculate optimal subsidy for using .
Solution Exercise 3[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- .
- The subsidy is positive because the marginal gain from shifting profit initially outweighs the subsidy cost.
Topic 4: The Ricardian Model[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Exercise 1: Constructing the Autarky Equilibrium[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Country with . Productivity: Wine , Cloth .
Questions:
- Calculate labor coefficients ().
- Write the PPF equation.
- Calculate MRT and explain opportunity cost.
- If wage , calculate autarky prices.
Solution Exercise 1[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- .
- PPF: .
- MRT = -4. Opportunity cost of 1 Wine is 4 Cloth.
- Prices: .
Exercise 2: General Equilibrium with Demand[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Consumers spend 50% on each good (Cobb-Douglas). .
Questions:
- Calculate Nominal GDP.
- Calculate physical demand for Wine and Cloth.
Solution Exercise 2[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- GDP = 2000.
- Demand: Wine = 50, Cloth = 200.
Exercise 3: Comparative Statics (Technical Progress)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Wine productivity doubles to .
Questions:
- New Prices?
- How does the PPF shift?
- Effect on Real Income?
Solution Exercise 3[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- falls to 10. stays 5.
- PPF rotates out along the Wine axis (max Wine = 200).
- Real Income increases (purchasing power for wine doubles).
Topic 5: Specific Factors Model[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Exercise 1: Labor Allocation & The "Bathtub" Diagram[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Labor . Specific factors: Land (Wine), Capital (Cloth). , . Prices: .
Questions:
- Calculate equilibrium labor allocation () and wage .
- Draw the Bathtub diagram.
- Explain diminishing returns.
Solution Exercise 1[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- . Wage .
Exercise 2: Winners and Losers[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Price of Wine doubles (). Wage rises to .
Questions:
- Labor: Calculate real wage changes (). Are they better off?
- Land Owners (Specific to Wine): Are they winners or losers?
- Capital Owners (Specific to Cloth): Are they winners or losers?
Solution Exercise 2[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Labor: Ambiguous. Real wage in Cloth rises (9), in Wine falls (9 < 10).
- Land: Winners (Price up + Productivity up).
- Capital: Losers (Price constant + Productivity down due to lost labor).
Exercise 3: Capital Accumulation[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Capital stock increases (Specific to Industry 2). Prices constant.
Questions:
- Which curve shifts in the diagram?
- Effect on Labor allocation and Output?
Solution Exercise 3[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- shifts up.
- Labor moves to Industry 2. Output of Industry 2 rises; Output of Industry 1 falls.
Topic 6: Heckscher-Ohlin Model[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Exercise 1: Factor Intensity[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Microchips (1) are Capital Intensive. T-Shirts (2) are Labor Intensive.
Questions:
- Define inequality for input coefficients.
- If rises, what happens to in both sectors?
Solution Exercise 1[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- .
- rises in both sectors (Substitution effect).
Exercise 2: Stolper-Samuelson[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Country exports Labor-intensive good. Price of Labor-intensive good rises.
Questions:
- What happens to ?
- Effect on Real Wage and Real Rental Rate?
Solution Exercise 2[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- increases.
- Real Wage: Increases (Workers win). Real Rental: Decreases (Capital owners lose).
Exercise 3: Factor Price Insensitivity[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Problem: Small Open Economy. Labor endowment increases by 20%. Prices fixed.
Questions:
- Do wages fall?
- How does the economy adjust?
Solution Exercise 3[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Wages do not fall (Factor Price Insensitivity).
- Rybczynski Effect: Output of Labor-intensive sector expands; Capital-intensive sector contracts.
MOCK EXAM 1[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Exercise 1: Strategic Trade Policy (Oligopoly)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Setup:
- Inverse Demand:
- MC: .
Questions:
- Reaction Functions: Derive .
- Equilibrium: Calculate Cournot-Nash quantities.
- Unilateral Subsidy: Subsidy for USA. Calculate new quantities.
- Profit: Calculate change in USA profit (excluding subsidy).
Solution Exam Ex 1[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- .
- .
- New .
- Profit increases from ~1111 to 1200.
Exercise 2: The Specific Factors Model[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Setup: Agria exports Corn. rises 20%. constant.
Questions:
- Labor Market: Draw the diagram shift. Does wage rise more or less than 20%?
- Real Income: Analyze Real Wage changes.
- Specific Factors: Explain Real Rental Rate changes for Land and Capital.
Solution Exam Ex 2[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Wage rises by less than 20% (diminishing returns).
- Real wage falls in terms of Corn, rises in terms of Electronics.
- Land: Real return rises. Capital: Real return falls.
Exercise 3: Tariffs & Welfare[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
Setup: Small country. , . World Price . Tariff .
Questions:
- Free Trade: Calculate Imports.
- Tariff: Calculate new Imports.
- Welfare: Calculate Production and Consumption Distortion losses.
Solution Exam Ex 3[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]
- Free Trade Imports = 30.
- Tariff Price = 40. Imports = 0.
- Loss = 150. (Production Loss 100 + Consumption Loss 50).