TU Wien:IT-based Management VU (Schwaiger)/Group project evaluation criteria

Aus VoWi
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen

Kriterium 1: Structure of the Project Paper

  • Requirement: The paper should follow the structure: 1) Introduction, 2) Methodology, 3) Empirical Results, 4) Summary.
  • Assessment Options:
    • No
    • Partially
    • Yes

Kriterium 2: Writing Style

  • Requirement: The paper must be written in an essay style, with clearly written and easily understandable sentences.
  • Assessment Options:
    • No
    • No, only fragmentarily
    • Only one chapter is well written
    • Two chapters are well written
    • Three chapters are well written
    • Yes, all chapters are well written

Kriterium 3: Introduction Chapter

  • Requirement: The Introduction chapter should include a well-written abstract and provide a good overview of the problem and its solution.
  • Assessment Options:
    • No
    • Abstract and overview are very vague
    • Abstract and overview are satisfactory
    • Abstract and overview are good
    • Abstract and overview are very well written

Kriterium 4: Methodology Chapter

  • Requirement: Are the five sub-contents of the Methodology chapter well explained?
  • Assessment Options:
    • No
    • No, only fragmentarily
    • Yes, three sub-contents are well explained
    • Yes, only 1 sub-content is not well explained
    • Yes, all five sub-contents are well explained

Kriterium 5: Empirical Results Chapter

  • Requirement: Are the three sub-contents of the Empirical Results chapter well explained?
  • Assessment Options:
    • No
    • No, only fragmentarily
    • Yes, two sub-contents are well explained
    • Yes, all three sub-contents are well explained

Kriterium 6: Summary Chapter

  • Requirement: The achieved Gini coefficients must be specified in the form of In-Sample and Out-of-Sample coefficients for WOE-binning results and should be well explained.
  • Assessment Options:
    • No Gini coefficients are mentioned
    • Some Gini coefficients are specified but hardly explained
    • Some Gini coefficients are specified and explained quite well
    • All Gini coefficients are specified and explained quite well
    • All Gini coefficients are specified even in matrix format and are well explained

Kriterium 7: Overall Quality

  • Requirement: Based on the assessments of previous criteria, grade the overall quality of the project work.
  • Assessment Options:
    • Not sufficient
    • Sufficient
    • Satisfactory
    • Good
    • Excellent

Kriterium 8: Data Splitting

  • Requirement: Does the data splitting correspond to a 75/25 ratio for the training and test sample?
  • Assessment Options:
    • No
    • Yes

Kriterium 9: Seed for Random Number Generator

  • Requirement: Was the seed for the random number generator changed?
  • Assessment Options:
    • Yes
    • No

Kriterium 10: Logistic Regression Variables

  • Requirement: Were five variables used in the logistic regression?
  • Assessment Options:
    • No
    • Yes

Kriterium 11: Variable Structure

  • Requirement: How many of the variables fulfill the requirement of having a linear or a U-shaped structure of their positive probabilities?
  • Assessment Options:
    • 3 or fewer
    • 4 variables
    • All 5 variables

Kriterium 12: In-Sample Gini Coefficient

  • Requirement: Which value exceeds the In-Sample Gini coefficient of the WOE-binning?
  • Assessment Options:
    • 50%
    • 55%
    • 60%
    • 62%
    • 63%
    • 64%
    • 65%

Overall Feedback

Provide an overall summary based on the evaluation:

  1. What was well done? Highlight specific strengths of the project.
  2. What can be improved? Suggest actionable areas for enhancement.
Abgerufen von „https://vowi.fsinf.at/index.php?title=TU_Wien:IT-based_Management_VU_(Schwaiger)/Group_project_evaluation_criteria&oldid=191084“