TU Wien:Recommender Systems VU (Neidhardt)

Aus VoWi
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Ähnlich benannte LVAs (Materialien):

Daten[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Vortragende Thomas Elmar KolbJulia NeidhardtMaria De Los Angeles Gwendolyn Aglae Rippberger FonsecaAhmadou Wagne
ECTS 3,0
Letzte Abhaltung 2026S
Sprache English
Mattermost recommender-systemsRegisterMattermost-Infos
Links tiss:194035, eLearning
Zuordnungen
Masterstudium Data Science Modul MLS/CO - Machine Learning and Statistics - Core (Gebundenes Wahlfach)


Inhalt[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

noch offen, bitte nicht von tiss oder Homepage kopieren, sondern aus Studierendensicht beschreiben.

Ablauf[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • 4 short exercises on JupyterHub (20 points)
  • 1 group project with 5-8 persons (30 points)
  • 1 exam, 60 minutes (50 points)

2026S[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

The lectures for Recommender Systems and User Modeling (6 ECTS) and Recommender Systems (3 ECTS) were held together. Because there were more students than the capacity of the lecture room, it was decided to teach in a hybrid form (in class lecture + live stream on Lecture Tube). The lecture was only live streamed but not recorded. Presence was not mandatory during the lecture.

The slides were provided after the lecture. Students noted that it would be helpful to have access to the slides before the lecture, but the course team decided to keep their approach.

Benötigte/Empfehlenswerte Vorkenntnisse[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • Exercises: Basic python programming
  • Project: Basic python programming, Neural Network and Git knowledge very useful

Vortrag[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

noch offen

Übungen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

2024S[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Individual assignments 1 to 4 proceeded as before. This time, the group assignment involved solving the RecSys Challenge related to recommending Danish news articles (see https://recsys.eb.dk/).

Fundamentally, the task (in groups of five) was actually interesting and enjoyable - however, nearly every circumstance prevented a thorough engagement with the content. Ultimately, this led to an incredible increase in time expenditure (60+ hours per person), which I have not previously encountered at the TU. Points of frustration included:

  • A poorly documented, buggy code framework.
  • Significant limitations of the environment intended for training - consistent various error messages and hardware restrictions.
  • Unclear specifications regarding submission and execution.

Compiling a functioning submission, including data, took an exceedingly long time. While well-intentioned, the exercise turned out to be excessive! Hopefully, this will not occur again. Additionally, the Danish newspaper involved is quite a low-quality publication similar to "Bild" in Germany - though this is, of course, irrelevant here.

To this time, grading has not be done... let's see but really difficult to do a fair rating with all hurdles and team issues. Really not a comfy situation.

Prüfung, Benotung[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Dauer der Zeugnisausstellung[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

noch offen

Zeitaufwand[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

noch offen

Unterlagen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

noch offen

Tipps[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

noch offen

Highlights / Lob[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

noch offen

Verbesserungsvorschläge / Kritik[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

noch offen