TU Wien:Responsible Research and Innovation VU (Purgathofer)
- Responsible Research and Innovation PR (Purgathofer) (TU Wien, 3 Resources)
- Responsible Research and Innovation VU (Purgathofer) (TU Wien, 0 Resources)
Daten[edit | edit source]
|Lecturers||Fabian Fischer• Daniela Fuchs• Peter Purgathofer|
|Alias||Responsible Research and Innovation (en)|
|Department||Visual Computing and Human-Centered Technology|
|Mattermost||responsible-research-and-innovation • Register • Mattermost-Infos|
|Master Media and Human-Centered Computing||Pflichtmodul Responsible Research and Innovation|
Inhalt[edit | edit source]
In this course you learn about the different RRI dimensions. Additionally, different methods of RRI will be introduced.
Ablauf[edit | edit source]
(WS18) The course consist of a lecture part and a practical part, where you get together in a group of 3 and prepare a presentation on one episode from the TV show "Black Mirror".
Benötigte/Empfehlenswerte Vorkenntnisse[edit | edit source]
Vortrag[edit | edit source]
The lectures are not explicitly mandatory to visit, but attendance will affect your final grade. The lecture itself is quite interesting and also very interactive. The lecturers also asks questions.
The presentation of your group will also take place during one of the lecture.
Übungen[edit | edit source]
WS18: For the practical part, students are split into groups of 3-4 and given a Black Mirror episode and two additional papers on RRI topics that relate to this episode. The task is to prepare a presentation discussion the episode, technology shown and any social and ethical concerns raised by it, using the provided research papers for additional context. After the presentation, there will be an in class discussion on those topics and possible solutions or mitigations.
Prüfung, Benotung[edit | edit source]
The grade consists of active participation, attendance, and the group work.
Dauer der Zeugnisausstellung[edit | edit source]
Zeitaufwand[edit | edit source]
Unterlagen[edit | edit source]
Tipps[edit | edit source]
Verbesserungsvorschläge / Kritik[edit | edit source]
WS18: I liked the course, but felt that there wasn't enough time dedicated to discussing the presentations in class. Also, I got the impression that my grade resulted from my admittedly bad attendance only, not from any other contributions. Attendance was strongly recommended, but not represented as mandatory, so I feel my bad grade was not quite deserved.